How do adults reason about their opponent? Typologies of players in a turn-taking game
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper reports a construction of typologies of players based on their strategic reasoning in turn-taking games. Classifications have been done based on latent class analysis and according to different orders of theory of mind, and exploratory validations have been provided for the resulting classifications. Finally, interaction of the typologies described by these classifications is discussed towards achieving a common perspective of typologies of players originating from various aspects of strategic thinking.
منابع مشابه
Studying strategies and types of players: experiments, logics and cognitive models
How do people reason about their opponent in turn-taking games? Often, people do not make the decisions that game theory would prescribe.We present a logic that can play a key role in understanding how people make their decisions, by delineating all plausible reasoning strategies in a systematic manner. This in turn makes it possible to construct a corresponding set of computational models in a...
متن کاملHeuristic Planning in Adversarial Dynamic Domains
Agents in highly dynamic adversarial domains, such as RTS games, must continually make time-critical decisions to adapt their behaviour to the changing environment. RTS games involve two players who build structures, recruit armies and fight for space and resources in order to control strategic points, destroy the opposing force and ultimately win the game. Other examples of adversarial domains...
متن کاملBeyond Minimax: Nonzero-Sum Game Tree Search with Knowledge Oriented Players
The classic minimax search for two-player zero-sum games such as chess has been thoroughly studied since the early years of AI; however for more general nonzero-sum games, minimax is non-optimal, given a player’s knowledge about the opponent. Previously, a few opponent models and algorithms such as M were introduced to improve minimax by simulating the opponent’s search, given the opponent’s st...
متن کاملHyper-Rational Choice and Economic Behaviour
In this paper, with help of the concept of hyper-rationality, we model the interaction between two investment companies by an important game as trickery game that has special equilibrium which called hyper-equilibrium. In trickery game, one company can choose cooperation with another company until the last moment and finally changes his action to non-cooperation which incur more loss to an oppo...
متن کاملRobust Opponent Modeling in Real-Time Strategy Games using Bayesian Networks
Opponent modeling is a key challenge in Real-Time Strategy (RTS) games as the environment is adversarial in these games, and the player cannot predict the future actions of her opponent. Additionally, the environment is partially observable due to the fog of war. In this paper, we propose an opponent model which is robust to the observation noise existing due to the fog of war. In order to cope...
متن کامل